1 00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:07,320 [Music] 2 00:00:12,140 --> 00:00:09,470 [Applause] 3 00:00:14,820 --> 00:00:12,150 general Adama graduate student at the 4 00:00:17,220 --> 00:00:14,830 University of South Florida and Tampa I 5 00:00:18,780 --> 00:00:17,230 work under dr. Matthew Pasic in 6 00:00:21,540 --> 00:00:18,790 collaboration with the Center for 7 00:00:24,330 --> 00:00:21,550 chemical evolution my work revolves 8 00:00:26,700 --> 00:00:24,340 around geochemistry with the 9 00:00:33,299 --> 00:00:26,710 incorporating phosphate into your 10 00:00:36,090 --> 00:00:33,309 biomolecules let's see so just a brief 11 00:00:39,450 --> 00:00:36,100 overview of the phosphorylation problem 12 00:00:41,700 --> 00:00:39,460 in prebiotic chemistry incorporating 13 00:00:43,710 --> 00:00:41,710 phosphorus into your biomolecules has 14 00:00:46,380 --> 00:00:43,720 been a known problem that has been 15 00:00:48,180 --> 00:00:46,390 studied for years it's actually a 16 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:48,190 two-part problem part of it being 17 00:00:53,310 --> 00:00:51,250 phosphate itself that the predominant 18 00:00:55,139 --> 00:00:53,320 phosphorus containing minerals on the 19 00:00:57,420 --> 00:00:55,149 Haiti and earth would have come from the 20 00:00:59,540 --> 00:00:57,430 apatite mineral group the calcium 21 00:01:02,880 --> 00:00:59,550 phosphates which were actually very 22 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:02,890 insoluble in water the other non 23 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:05,770 biogenic non biogenic phosphorus 24 00:01:10,889 --> 00:01:07,450 containing minerals would have actually 25 00:01:13,410 --> 00:01:10,899 been more rare and in niche environments 26 00:01:15,750 --> 00:01:13,420 so I have been sticking with the apatite 27 00:01:18,030 --> 00:01:15,760 mineral group but that leads into the 28 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:18,040 next problem with phosphorus which is 29 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:20,890 that as I said it's insoluble and water 30 00:01:26,250 --> 00:01:24,130 your appetite as the phosphorylation 31 00:01:27,810 --> 00:01:26,260 reaction itself requires a dehydration 32 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:27,820 step which of course would be 33 00:01:33,899 --> 00:01:31,530 unfavorable in a water-based solution so 34 00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:33,909 historically scientists have used 35 00:01:38,149 --> 00:01:35,710 multiple routes in order to overcome 36 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:38,159 this problem they've incorporated 37 00:01:44,670 --> 00:01:41,530 condensing agents into their systems 38 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:44,680 such as your your cyanamide they've done 39 00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:46,450 high temperature heating in order to 40 00:01:50,999 --> 00:01:48,850 drive off water within the system and 41 00:01:53,749 --> 00:01:51,009 others have used non-aqueous solvents 42 00:01:56,670 --> 00:01:53,759 such as formamide or the deep eutectic 43 00:01:58,560 --> 00:01:56,680 solvent of urea calling chloride and 44 00:02:00,749 --> 00:01:58,570 more recently out of the Center for 45 00:02:04,679 --> 00:02:00,759 chemical evolution dr. Parker had worked 46 00:02:07,469 --> 00:02:04,689 with a alternative solvent called a UAF 47 00:02:10,259 --> 00:02:07,479 w which is urea ammonium formate and 48 00:02:12,780 --> 00:02:10,269 water there's a lot of unique features 49 00:02:15,319 --> 00:02:12,790 that we discovered with this UAF w we 50 00:02:18,390 --> 00:02:15,329 found that just in this system alone 51 00:02:20,410 --> 00:02:18,400 formamide is actually created under mild 52 00:02:23,140 --> 00:02:20,420 heating conditions 53 00:02:24,940 --> 00:02:23,150 actually increases the solubility of 54 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:24,950 phosphate containing minerals and 55 00:02:30,550 --> 00:02:27,530 promotes phosphorylation it has very 56 00:02:33,730 --> 00:02:30,560 broad temperature stability ammonium 57 00:02:35,140 --> 00:02:33,740 formate and urea itself forms a solution 58 00:02:36,970 --> 00:02:35,150 with the freezing point as low as 59 00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:36,980 negative 30 C and it's used throughout 60 00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:40,250 industry as a de-icing agent and the 61 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:42,530 components of at the urea the ammonium 62 00:02:48,220 --> 00:02:44,810 formate in the water were all prebiotic 63 00:02:51,220 --> 00:02:48,230 available components now as I said dr. 64 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:51,230 Burke our and his collaborators at the 65 00:02:55,870 --> 00:02:52,730 Center for chemical evolution have 66 00:02:58,479 --> 00:02:55,880 published paper in 2016 utilizing this 67 00:03:01,090 --> 00:02:58,489 alternative salva in a 1 to 2 to 4 molar 68 00:03:03,190 --> 00:03:01,100 ratio not only was he able to 69 00:03:05,770 --> 00:03:03,200 phosphorylate adenosine within this 70 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:05,780 system but he also showed that by doping 71 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:07,970 in some magnesium chloride he was able 72 00:03:15,670 --> 00:03:12,170 to actually convert hydroxyl apatite 20 73 00:03:18,670 --> 00:03:15,680 more soluble mineral called struvite it 74 00:03:22,510 --> 00:03:18,680 is important to note that in his work he 75 00:03:24,699 --> 00:03:22,520 did use a urea water system without any 76 00:03:28,740 --> 00:03:24,709 ammonium formate available and was 77 00:03:32,740 --> 00:03:28,750 actually got no detectable results of 78 00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:32,750 phosphorylation so this led into my work 79 00:03:37,210 --> 00:03:35,330 with this alternative solvent what I 80 00:03:40,330 --> 00:03:37,220 wanted to do was to determine the actual 81 00:03:43,270 --> 00:03:40,340 robustness of the solvent in more than 82 00:03:45,550 --> 00:03:43,280 just the 1 to 2 to 4 molar ratio and to 83 00:03:48,009 --> 00:03:45,560 determine how prebiotic aliy available 84 00:03:50,650 --> 00:03:48,019 would it have been geologically on the 85 00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:50,660 early Earth so we started with urea 86 00:03:55,870 --> 00:03:53,090 formation and we know that urea has been 87 00:03:58,990 --> 00:03:55,880 detected and excuse me detected in 88 00:04:01,930 --> 00:03:59,000 comets and meteorites and that urea is 89 00:04:03,940 --> 00:04:01,940 actually just as urea formation comes 90 00:04:07,210 --> 00:04:03,950 from a simple reaction between ammonia 91 00:04:09,820 --> 00:04:07,220 gas and carbon dioxide so we did some 92 00:04:14,140 --> 00:04:09,830 thermodynamic work and just plotted the 93 00:04:16,449 --> 00:04:14,150 urea formation on a log-log plot of the 94 00:04:19,420 --> 00:04:16,459 partial pressures of carbon dioxide to 95 00:04:21,729 --> 00:04:19,430 ammonia and found that even in a lower 96 00:04:25,270 --> 00:04:21,739 ammonia atmosphere that you would have 97 00:04:28,060 --> 00:04:25,280 urea formation from temperatures the red 98 00:04:30,370 --> 00:04:28,070 line let's see the red line at the 99 00:04:32,589 --> 00:04:30,380 bottom is when the temperatures are at 100 00:04:33,820 --> 00:04:32,599 zero degrees anything about that you're 101 00:04:36,339 --> 00:04:33,830 going to create the 102 00:04:38,559 --> 00:04:36,349 excuse me you're gonna create urea and 103 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:38,569 then I also plotted it at a hundred 104 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:41,090 degrees C and you can see that you would 105 00:04:46,029 --> 00:04:43,490 have urea formation up there so we were 106 00:04:48,159 --> 00:04:46,039 satisfied with the fact that urea itself 107 00:04:49,869 --> 00:04:48,169 would probably have been available in a 108 00:04:52,059 --> 00:04:49,879 lot of different geological settings 109 00:04:53,770 --> 00:04:52,069 just made out of the atmosphere so we 110 00:04:56,469 --> 00:04:53,780 wanted to move on to the ammonium 111 00:04:58,869 --> 00:04:56,479 formate now for the ammonium formate we 112 00:05:02,200 --> 00:04:58,879 envision more of a Darwin's warm little 113 00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:02,210 pond theory so this is a model system of 114 00:05:09,100 --> 00:05:05,930 a lake with an input of hydrogen cyanide 115 00:05:11,230 --> 00:05:09,110 from the atmosphere now hydrogen cyanide 116 00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:11,240 hydrolysis and product is ammonium 117 00:05:15,459 --> 00:05:13,250 formate and of course the mid product of 118 00:05:18,760 --> 00:05:15,469 that being formamide which has been used 119 00:05:21,100 --> 00:05:18,770 throughout prebiotic chemistry so what 120 00:05:25,209 --> 00:05:21,110 we did was took a just a small lake 121 00:05:28,990 --> 00:05:25,219 added in a daily input of hydrogen 122 00:05:32,670 --> 00:05:29,000 cyanide to it coming from Mal cows keys 123 00:05:36,820 --> 00:05:32,680 not sure the pronunciation of the name 124 00:05:38,980 --> 00:05:36,830 2002 paper and PA and PNAS that showed 125 00:05:43,149 --> 00:05:38,990 that just a small amount of hydrogen 126 00:05:45,339 --> 00:05:43,159 cyanide over time would actually form in 127 00:05:48,430 --> 00:05:45,349 earth would fall into this lake and 128 00:05:50,860 --> 00:05:48,440 hydrolysis into ammonium formate and as 129 00:05:53,140 --> 00:05:50,870 you can see here in just 20 years we can 130 00:05:56,700 --> 00:05:53,150 actually get a molar concentration in 131 00:05:59,769 --> 00:05:56,710 the lake of about four point four five 132 00:06:03,219 --> 00:05:59,779 point four point four five moles of 133 00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:03,229 ammonium formate so we said okay we know 134 00:06:07,089 --> 00:06:05,330 water is going to be available ammonium 135 00:06:08,559 --> 00:06:07,099 formate urea it seems like it would be 136 00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:08,569 plausible in a lot of different 137 00:06:14,890 --> 00:06:11,330 conditions but what happens in different 138 00:06:19,420 --> 00:06:14,900 molar ratios of this because a 1 to 2 to 139 00:06:22,689 --> 00:06:19,430 4 molar ratio is very specific and might 140 00:06:25,930 --> 00:06:22,699 only be found in certain areas so what I 141 00:06:29,559 --> 00:06:25,940 did here is I just took multiple 142 00:06:32,050 --> 00:06:29,569 different molar ratios of the UAF w 143 00:06:34,899 --> 00:06:32,060 plotted them on a ternary diagram and 144 00:06:36,939 --> 00:06:34,909 after three days just took a look at the 145 00:06:44,079 --> 00:06:36,949 physical characteristics and you can see 146 00:06:46,870 --> 00:06:44,089 from the oops there we go you can see 147 00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:46,880 from the top picture up here that in a 148 00:06:49,629 --> 00:06:47,330 lot 149 00:06:52,899 --> 00:06:49,639 the molar ratios where you have urea and 150 00:06:56,140 --> 00:06:52,909 an excess in three days the system dries 151 00:06:58,990 --> 00:06:56,150 out to a completely dry system but it's 152 00:07:01,180 --> 00:06:59,000 at 72 degrees open to the atmosphere to 153 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:01,190 allow the volatile to escape and there 154 00:07:06,790 --> 00:07:03,530 are some molar ratios that remain liquid 155 00:07:10,420 --> 00:07:06,800 so on the ternary diagram I just plotted 156 00:07:12,339 --> 00:07:10,430 the the green dots being what remained a 157 00:07:14,230 --> 00:07:12,349 liquid and the red being a solid and you 158 00:07:16,390 --> 00:07:14,240 can see that there's actually quite a 159 00:07:18,070 --> 00:07:16,400 decent area in there in which you would 160 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:18,080 have remained a liquid environment 161 00:07:22,779 --> 00:07:20,690 within just the three days now this is 162 00:07:25,559 --> 00:07:22,789 not doing any wet/dry cycling this is 163 00:07:28,420 --> 00:07:25,569 just allowing it to sit open in the oven 164 00:07:30,369 --> 00:07:28,430 at the same time I wanted to see what 165 00:07:33,249 --> 00:07:30,379 the solubility of hydroxyl apatite 166 00:07:35,529 --> 00:07:33,259 itself would be within this you afw at 167 00:07:38,140 --> 00:07:35,539 the different molar ratios so again we 168 00:07:40,510 --> 00:07:38,150 created up 10 milliliters of each of the 169 00:07:43,390 --> 00:07:40,520 different molar ratios added in some 170 00:07:45,999 --> 00:07:43,400 hydroxyl apatite put them in an oven at 171 00:07:48,070 --> 00:07:46,009 74 C left open to the environment to 172 00:07:51,159 --> 00:07:48,080 allow the escape of the volatile sand 173 00:07:55,059 --> 00:07:51,169 and after 14 days we analyze these 174 00:07:58,540 --> 00:07:55,069 samples on an icp-oes and that was 175 00:08:01,120 --> 00:07:58,550 actually through our University and in 176 00:08:03,700 --> 00:08:01,130 collaboration with st. Louis University 177 00:08:07,870 --> 00:08:03,710 with Paul Baraka and Rio Fabry 178 00:08:09,909 --> 00:08:07,880 and the results that we got from that we 179 00:08:12,309 --> 00:08:09,919 plotted again on a ternary diagram and 180 00:08:15,700 --> 00:08:12,319 it was actually quite surprising what we 181 00:08:19,930 --> 00:08:15,710 found was that and you can see here that 182 00:08:21,519 --> 00:08:19,940 in the result says free phosphorus 183 00:08:23,559 --> 00:08:21,529 there's actually quite a bit of the 184 00:08:25,719 --> 00:08:23,569 molar ratios where we had seventy to a 185 00:08:29,589 --> 00:08:25,729 hundred percent of free phosphorus 186 00:08:32,939 --> 00:08:29,599 available in this you afw meaning that 187 00:08:37,149 --> 00:08:32,949 the UAF w itself actually sell you lies 188 00:08:39,339 --> 00:08:37,159 appetite there's a decent amount there 189 00:08:42,339 --> 00:08:39,349 that is within the 30 to 70 percent 190 00:08:45,460 --> 00:08:42,349 range which is still remarkable compared 191 00:08:48,430 --> 00:08:45,470 to not soluble in water but then there's 192 00:08:50,530 --> 00:08:48,440 also a very specific area in which there 193 00:08:52,060 --> 00:08:50,540 was no free phosphorus or very little 194 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:52,070 free phosphorus available in this 195 00:08:57,150 --> 00:08:54,370 solution and 196 00:08:59,340 --> 00:08:57,160 see here so on the dotted line I drew 197 00:09:01,650 --> 00:08:59,350 there it you can see that it actually 198 00:09:03,150 --> 00:09:01,660 follows the trend between where you have 199 00:09:05,820 --> 00:09:03,160 a high amount of free phosphorus 200 00:09:08,250 --> 00:09:05,830 available versus a moderate to low 201 00:09:10,530 --> 00:09:08,260 amount and what we found was that the 202 00:09:12,690 --> 00:09:10,540 more urea that is in the solution 203 00:09:16,950 --> 00:09:12,700 compared to the ammonium formate molar 204 00:09:20,370 --> 00:09:16,960 ratio you actually decrease the your 205 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:20,380 solubility of the solution so urea is 206 00:09:26,430 --> 00:09:22,810 actually seeming to inhibit the 207 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:26,440 solubility of hydroxyl apatite within 208 00:09:33,930 --> 00:09:31,210 the system but urea actually seems to be 209 00:09:36,630 --> 00:09:33,940 somewhat necessary within the system in 210 00:09:39,329 --> 00:09:36,640 order to drive down the water because as 211 00:09:42,810 --> 00:09:39,339 I said it apatite is insoluble in water 212 00:09:44,550 --> 00:09:42,820 so if we have any water in the system we 213 00:09:46,860 --> 00:09:44,560 need to drive up enough of it off in 214 00:09:50,700 --> 00:09:46,870 order to soluble eyes this phosphorus 215 00:09:53,850 --> 00:09:50,710 mineral and so there's a point at which 216 00:09:56,550 --> 00:09:53,860 about 75% water if you have more than 217 00:09:59,730 --> 00:09:56,560 that available you no longer have the 218 00:10:02,070 --> 00:09:59,740 solubility of this hydroxyl apatite but 219 00:10:04,500 --> 00:10:02,080 again when you're talking about the fact 220 00:10:06,690 --> 00:10:04,510 that is the system robust we can see 221 00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:06,700 that there's still quite a range here in 222 00:10:11,250 --> 00:10:08,770 which of molar ratios that you're going 223 00:10:13,019 --> 00:10:11,260 to have this system available that will 224 00:10:16,260 --> 00:10:13,029 soluble eyes your hydroxyl apatite 225 00:10:19,110 --> 00:10:16,270 minerals so just a quick conclusion to 226 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:19,120 go over it the solubility of phosphate 227 00:10:25,100 --> 00:10:21,250 minerals is actually controlled by the 228 00:10:27,630 --> 00:10:25,110 molar ratios of this UAF W system 229 00:10:30,510 --> 00:10:27,640 dissolution of phosphate requires a 230 00:10:32,220 --> 00:10:30,520 liquid medium but at the same time we 231 00:10:35,010 --> 00:10:32,230 don't want too much of the water 232 00:10:37,230 --> 00:10:35,020 available and as long as the UAF W 233 00:10:39,540 --> 00:10:37,240 remains in this liquid system the 234 00:10:41,699 --> 00:10:39,550 solubility of the phosphate mineral will 235 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:41,709 be enhanced and greater enhancement 236 00:10:46,440 --> 00:10:43,810 comes with a higher amount of ammonium 237 00:10:48,630 --> 00:10:46,450 formate versus the urea we're 238 00:10:51,510 --> 00:10:48,640 hypothesizing that ureas role within 239 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:51,520 this system is actually as a condensing 240 00:10:56,370 --> 00:10:54,130 agent that it doesn't do anything for 241 00:10:58,320 --> 00:10:56,380 the soluble izing of the phosphate or 242 00:11:00,180 --> 00:10:58,330 freeing of the phosphate but that it is 243 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:00,190 actually helping to drive off the water 244 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:03,010 within the system and make a eutectic 245 00:11:07,129 --> 00:11:05,170 and that the ammonium formate is 246 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:07,139 actually the key leading age 247 00:11:13,460 --> 00:11:10,410 that is taking the phosphate out of the 248 00:11:16,569 --> 00:11:13,470 calcium phosphate mineral and with that 249 00:11:18,769 --> 00:11:16,579 I would like to acknowledge my 250 00:11:21,259 --> 00:11:18,779 collaboration within the CCE 251 00:11:23,539 --> 00:11:21,269 my lab mates at USF for all their help 252 00:11:34,039 --> 00:11:23,549 and encouragement and of course our 253 00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:34,049 funding God's NSF and NASA Thank You 254 00:11:50,610 --> 00:11:47,490 Dave your first time yeah I got her in 255 00:11:54,390 --> 00:11:50,620 an open system with ammonium formate yes 256 00:11:57,600 --> 00:11:54,400 the ammonia nh3 will leave the system 257 00:12:00,630 --> 00:11:57,610 right it'll become more acid oh my god 258 00:12:03,260 --> 00:12:00,640 maybe behind formic acid therefore acid 259 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:03,270 alone can solubilize the appetite 260 00:12:09,510 --> 00:12:06,730 absolutely and I would like to and have 261 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:09,520 not done yet to determine the final PHS 262 00:12:13,110 --> 00:12:11,050 but as you could see in that picture 263 00:12:17,250 --> 00:12:13,120 because we're using just a small amount 264 00:12:20,220 --> 00:12:17,260 of the UAF w solution it's very 265 00:12:22,110 --> 00:12:20,230 difficult to get an actual pH on those 266 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:22,120 amounts at the end I'd like to try a 267 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:24,370 larger based experiment so that we can 268 00:12:32,370 --> 00:12:35,600 okay 269 00:12:41,690 --> 00:12:38,740 perfect thank you I'll do that thank you 270 00:12:43,210 --> 00:12:41,700 if there are no more questions I'd like